[Barlibash] Attn: Hyatt Bash attendees || rex folks can read ittoo ; )

[Katherine Eppich]

I'll probably be at the Rex, with no roomies other than Craig, if he decides 
to come. ;)

Miss Kitty



"Trust the wolves, but do not tell them where you are going."





>From: "jincey" <jincey at theonering.net>
>To: <maegwen at theonering.net>, <Barlibash at theonering.net>
>Subject: RE: [Barlibash] Attn: Hyatt Bash attendees || rex folks can read 
>ittoo ; )
>Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:20:06 -0400
>
>Hiya folks,
>
>For whatever it is worth, this change after the hyatt agreement was made
>doesn't make me very happy. I have a feeling the hyatt kinda sorta forgot
>about the extra charge for occupancy over 2 and now have to come back and
>add this. Please make sure you read the stuff I highlighted in blue very
>carefully, if you haven't already.
>
>We'd like some feedback from anyone who reads this email:
>who is staying at hyatt regardless and with who as roomies
>who is staying at rex regardless and w/ who as roomies
>who is seriously considering changing from hyatt to rex and with who as
>roomies
>
>this will give us an idea of how things are filling up : ))
>
>thanks : )
>jincey
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: barlibash-bounces+jincey=theonering.net at theonering.net
>[mailto:barlibash-bounces+jincey=theonering.net at theonering.net] On Behalf 
>Of
>maegwen
>Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 5:03 PM
>To: Barlibash at theonering.net
>Subject: [Barlibash] Attn: Hyatt Bash attendees
>
>
>The following problem was called to my attention today. Please take note of
>the solution and/or view:
>http://www.theonering.net/barlimans/barlibash/2006/hotel.html#costs
>
>I informed the Hyatt that in all likelihood many of you may choose to stay
>at the Hotel Rex, but they would not deduct the fee, which they state is
>hotel policy relating to labor costs.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: maegwen [mailto:maegwen at theonering.net]
>Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 3:25 PM
>Cc: 'jincey at theonering.net'
>Subject: RE: [Barlibash] Hotel Information!
>
>
>Ok, well, I just had an enlightening phone conversation with the Hyatt.
>
>Our courtesy agreement with the Hyatt makes no specification about how many
>people are allowed in the room. It states 199.00 for a single or double
>room. I just spoke with the customer sales representative that I have been
>dealing with and she apologized for the vagueness of the agreement, and
>confirmed that the hotel does indeed charge $25.00 extra per night, per
>person.
>
>However, she asked *sotto voce* if she could let me in on a little secret,
>to which I responded "Of course." She went on to say "no one ever checks on
>how many people are in the room." With nearly 700 rooms, I can imagine that
>that is true.
>
>I am very unhappy that the Hyatt was unable to officially adhere to the
>information conveyed in our courtesy agreement. I leave it up to you as to
>whether you wish to fudge the number of people in your room or switch to 
>the
>Hotel Rex.
>
>I will have to adapt the information on the hotel page. Thank you for
>calling this to my attention.
>
>-- maegwen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 1:49 AM
> > To: maegwen at theonering.net
> > Subject: RE: [Barlibash] Hotel Information!
> >
> >
> > Maegwen, I just called the Hyatt to make a hotel reservation,
> > and they told me that with 4 people in the room, the room
> > rate is $249, even though I told her we had a special rate of
> > $199. That does make a difference for those who wish to do
> > this as inexpensively as possible. Is there someone you can
> > contact to verify or dispute this?
> >
> > Thanks,
>
>_______________________________________________
>Barlibash mailing list
>Barlibash at theonering.net
>http://www.theonering.net/mailman/listinfo/barlibash
>


>_______________________________________________
>Barlibash mailing list
>Barlibash at theonering.net
>http://www.theonering.net/mailman/listinfo/barlibash