<<< - << Prev | Reading Room | Next >> - >>>
Message Thread - Collate Replies - Post a Reply - FAQ

• Frodo and Deconstruction (WARNING:  Artsy-Fartsy content)  <notlost>  [11/14/2003 @ 13:34]  (8/79)
• No, no, no!  Tolkien would have despised deconstruction.  <Curious>  [11/17/2003 @ 2:15]  (1/15)
• You may be right . . .  <nerdanel50>  [11/17/2003 @ 12:20]  (2/14)
• Your logic is impeccable.  <Curious>  [11/17/2003 @ 12:56]  (1/5)
• Confess  <nerdanel50>  [11/17/2003 @ 13:26]  (1/4)
• Yes, of  <Curious>  [11/17/2003 @ 13:36]  (1/3)
• OK, I'll bite.  <nerdanel50>  [11/17/2003 @ 17:55]  (1/2)
• I  <Curious>  [11/17/2003 @ 18:33]  (1/1)
• Yes  (No Text)  <nerdanel50>  [11/17/2003 @ 19:33]  (0/0)
• I don't think you have  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 12:24]  (1/7)
• Exactly.  <Curious>  [11/17/2003 @ 13:04]  (1/6)
• Only  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 16:14]  (1/5)
• I  <Curious>  [11/17/2003 @ 17:07]  (3/4)
• Two key points!! First,  <Smallbottle>  [11/17/2003 @ 20:32]  (1/1)
• Nicely said!  (No Text)  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 23:42]  (0/0)
• Of course  <Ransom>  [11/17/2003 @ 19:09]  (0/0)
• My Freudian Analysis...  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 18:48]  (0/0)
• One wish...that Reverend were here  <hatster>  [11/16/2003 @ 23:08]  (2/12)
• Indeed...  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 12:18]  (1/10)
• Comfort yourself,  <nerdanel50>  [11/17/2003 @ 12:31]  (2/9)
• Waitaminute....  <Arquen>  [11/17/2003 @ 13:37]  (2/7)
• Hey now, rest easy!  <Takeo>  [11/17/2003 @ 19:16]  (1/1)
• Thanks, Takeo  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 23:44]  (0/0)
• Obsession...  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 16:20]  (1/4)
• can you send me a link?  (No Text)  <Arquen>  [11/17/2003 @ 16:52]  (2/3)
• Try this  (No Text - Link Inside)  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 23:56]  (1/1)
• thanks...hmmmm  <Arquen>  [11/18/2003 @ 0:41]  (0/0)
• I can't seem to  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 18:55]  (0/0)
• Reverend loved  <Curious>  [11/17/2003 @ 13:08]  (0/0)
• Amen to that! . . .  <nerdanel50>  [11/17/2003 @ 1:55]  (0/0)
• Nothing to add  <gullygilly>  [11/16/2003 @ 12:40]  (0/0)
• Too deep for me man!  (No Text)  <Golfimbul>  [11/16/2003 @ 10:48]  (0/0)
• Nothing to add to a fun discussion,  <NZ Strider>  [11/16/2003 @ 0:53]  (1/1)
• In large part  <notlost>  [11/16/2003 @ 18:22]  (0/0)
• no this is completely wrong  <Gloinster>  [11/15/2003 @ 14:50]  (0/0)
• Ooh, ooh, me! Call on me!  <nerdanel50>  [11/14/2003 @ 18:36]  (5/40)
• Hey, Ner...  <Arquen>  [11/16/2003 @ 20:11]  (0/0)
• On Evil  in the Shire  <drogo_drogo>  [11/15/2003 @ 9:29]  (2/8)
• Beautifully said.  <Takeo>  [11/16/2003 @ 12:13]  (2/6)
• I need a lot more coffee for that one,  <nerdanel50>  [11/16/2003 @ 15:18]  (1/2)
• *Pulls mental muscle trying to deal with heavy material*  <Takeo>  [11/17/2003 @ 9:26]  (1/1)
• Wonderful questions,  <nerdanel50>  [11/17/2003 @ 17:43]  (0/0)
• Could we argue...  <notlost>  [11/16/2003 @ 14:31]  (1/2)
• Hmm.  A Catholic metaphor for  <Takeo>  [11/17/2003 @ 8:32]  (1/1)
• I like the notion of "Frodo as Saint"  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 12:21]  (0/0)
• Exactly!  <nerdanel50>  [11/15/2003 @ 13:20]  (0/0)
• yep...isn't it odd how  <hatster>  [11/15/2003 @ 0:12]  (1/24)
• Odd, and interesting  <nerdanel50>  [11/15/2003 @ 1:13]  (2/23)
• Dementia praecox, Bleuler, and associational thinking  <Takeo>  [11/15/2003 @ 12:04]  (4/16)
• Just one thing...  <Arquen>  [11/16/2003 @ 13:07]  (3/5)
• And, I might add...  <notlost>  [11/16/2003 @ 18:05]  (0/0)
• Indeed!  <notlost>  [11/16/2003 @ 17:53]  (1/2)
• OT: What I do...  <Arquen>  [11/16/2003 @ 20:02]  (1/1)
• That IS cool!  (No Text)  <notlost>  [11/16/2003 @ 20:43]  (0/0)
• Yes!  (No Text)  <nerdanel50>  [11/16/2003 @ 15:33]  (0/0)
• Yes, thank you Takeo.  <nerdanel50>  [11/15/2003 @ 23:07]  (2/2)
• Good point...  <notlost>  [11/17/2003 @ 12:30]  (0/0)
• On the contrary, those are good  <Takeo>  [11/16/2003 @ 10:23]  (0/0)
• You know, Takeo...  <notlost>  [11/15/2003 @ 21:03]  (2/4)
• Oh, a lot of the time  <Takeo>  [11/16/2003 @ 9:14]  (1/2)
• Indeed  <nerdanel50>  [11/16/2003 @ 13:24]  (1/1)
• I've been  <Arquen>  [11/17/2003 @ 1:00]  (0/0)
• I think of this room as a virtual "Bird and Baby"  <drogo_drogo>  [11/15/2003 @ 21:43]  (0/0)
• Thanks Takeo  <hatster>  [11/15/2003 @ 12:45]  (1/1)
• Heh heh heh.  <Takeo>  [11/16/2003 @ 10:34]  (0/0)
• Or it is only that sad soul most influenced by  <hatster>  [11/15/2003 @ 1:41]  (2/5)
• Good point!  <notlost>  [11/15/2003 @ 20:39]  (1/1)
• notlost,, you have to read my post on  the thread directly below this  <hatster>  [11/16/2003 @ 2:09]  (0/0)
• WWTT?  <nerdanel50>  [11/15/2003 @ 16:01]  (1/2)
• an appropriate poem for the moment  <hatster>  [11/16/2003 @ 1:53]  (1/1)
• Thanks for that, hatster  (No Text)  <notlost>  [11/16/2003 @ 20:44]  (0/0)
• Language "vs." Experience  <Ninnyhammer_of_the_Shire>  [11/14/2003 @ 21:44]  (1/1)
• That's pretty close  <nerdanel50>  [11/15/2003 @ 1:04]  (0/0)
• Thank Goodness  <notlost>  [11/14/2003 @ 20:21]  (1/2)
• Thanks for raising the question!  <nerdanel50>  [11/14/2003 @ 22:38]  (1/1)
• One day  <notlost>  [11/15/2003 @ 20:52]  (0/0)
• Forgive my ignorance  <Firiel50>  [11/14/2003 @ 14:14]  (1/3)
• I think  <notlost>  [11/14/2003 @ 14:59]  (1/2)
• Is "deconstruction" a process  <Ninnyhammer_of_the_Shire>  [11/14/2003 @ 16:31]  (1/1)
• Process/product  <notlost>  [11/14/2003 @ 20:29]  (0/0)

TheOneRing.net Rumour Mill's RPGBoard script (V2.22) was created by Brendan Byrd/SineSwiper of Resonator Software.  It is copylefted under the conditions of the GNU Public License (GPL).  It can be freely distributed and modified as long as it retains its GPL status.