IGN.com TheOneRing.net Newbie Guide
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien
Lord of the Rings - J.R.R. Tolkien

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien
Links
Home
The Movies
Spy Reports
Features
Barlimans
Discussion
Main
Reading Room
Movie Discussion
The Arena
Gaming
Feedback
Fan Section
Gaming Havens
Green Books
Community
Shop
Newbie Guide
Archives
Site Info
TBHL

<<< - << Prev | Reading Room | Next >> - >>>
Message Thread - Collate Replies - Post a Reply - FAQ

Nick: Gwynfor (Registered User)
Date/Time: Fri, 8/15/2003 at 21:55 EDT (Sat, 8/16/2003 at 11:55 EAST)
Browser/OS: Microsoft Internet Explorer V6.0 using Windows NT 5.1
In Reply To: Book V Chapter IV: The Siege of Gondor #22-- Not so fond of Grond  <gullygilly>  [8/15/2003 @ 10:35]  (9/10)
Subject:
On the naming of weapons, and ephemera.
Message:

The naming of weapons, even of seige weapons, is well precedented in history. The trebuchet used by Edward I during the first seige of Stirling Castle in 1304 was named Warwolf, for example. There is, of course, a long tradition of naming swords, spears and other hand to hand weapons in Northern European legend and myth (Mjolnir, Thor's Hammer... The Gaebolg, Cu Chulainn's war spear). There was a strong sense that naming something gave it power. A form of animism, if you will, and that knowledge of the name gave one some dominion over the object/person as well (a concept well explored by Ursula le Guin in her Wizard of Earthsea series, where wizards like Ged the Archmage learn the true names of things in order to control them). I don't think that naming the weapon makes the passage any creepier. One could do just as well by using analogy or pure description, I think.

"The wolf-headed ram was inexorably drawn back. There was a moment of still menace as it halted at the top of it's back swing, and then, with a groaning creak it swung forward, gathering speed as it arced toward the iron bound gates. The armies stood silent, transfixed by the enormity and power of the massive weapon. Boom! The sound of its striking the gates rolled over the field, filling the defenders with dire fear." I am no Tolkien when it comes to being a wordsmith, but I think that gives a hint of what could be done.

Tolien uses alliteration, imagery, analogy, onomatopeia and symbolism to heighten the emotion of nearly all his passages, whether it be to describe the tranquility of Imladris, the might of Gandalf or the horror of the attack upon the gates. He also uses cadence, which really is only of value when the passage is read aloud. These techniques were all commonly used in the Saxon, Norse and Finnish sagas and legends which were a rich source of inspiration for Tolkien.

The text explicitly says that spells of ruin were bound into Grond during it's making. Were the gates of Minas Tirith also formed with some magic? I don't think so. Minas Arnor was made by men, and therefore I would believe that it was simply a superior fortress by virtue of the skill of its creators and its fantastic natural position backed hard up against Mindolluin.

Who bound the spells of ruin into Grond? It may have been Sauron, or the Mouth of Sauron, both of whom were at Barad-dur during it's construction. It may have been the Witch-king of Angmar, or any of Suron's nameless minions versed in the forging of weapons and magic. Why name it after Melkor's mace? It's a large blunt weapon, so the epithet seems entirely appropriate.

No further observations at this juncture. :)

Password to delete message:  



TheOneRing.net Rumour Mill's RPGBoard script (V2.22) was created by Brendan Byrd/SineSwiper of Resonator Software.  It is copylefted under the conditions of the GNU Public License (GPL).  It can be freely distributed and modified as long as it retains its GPL status. 


home | contact us | back to top | site map | search | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 2000 TheOneRing®.net. TheOneRing® is a registered service mark with exclusive right to grant use assigned to The One Ring, Inc. Unique Design by DesignHeroes.com