Does one have to actually put the ring on...

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien

Links

Home

The Movies

Spy Reports

Features

Barlimans

Discussion

	Main
	Reading Room
	Movie Discussion
	The Arena
	Gaming
	Feedback

Fan Section

Gaming Havens

Green Books

Community

Shop

Newbie Guide

Archives

Site Info

TBHL

<<< - << Prev | Reading Room | Next >> - >>>
Message Thread - Collate Replies - Post a Reply - FAQ

Nick:	iowaboy (Registered User)
Date/Time:	Mon, 9/30/2002 at 20:48 EDT
Browser/OS:	AOL Browser V7.0 using Windows NT 5.1
In Reply To:	Answers/opinions needed on Frodo's use of the Ring: NZ_Strider: you commented on this once; others also welcome... <mallorn-ws> [9/30/2002 @ 19:51] (7/58)
Subject:	Does one have to actually put the ring on...
Message:
to exert it's power over another? Or is merely possessing the ring on one's person enough? I say yes--look at the power the ring has over Gollum and Bilbo when they no longer possess it; and, as you say, look at the power Frodo has over Gollum even as the ring-bearer. Look, as well, over the burden of carrying it even without putting on, as Frodo finds as he gets nearer to Mordor. **************************************** "Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated" --Gandalf--

Message Thread:

Answers/opinions needed on Frodo's use of the Ring: NZ_Strider: you commented on this once; others also welcome... <mallorn-ws> [9/30/2002 @ 19:51] (7/58)

I am truly indebted to you all for your great efforts <mallorn-ws> [10/1/2002 @ 20:21] (1/1)

who, us, "stubborn"? (smile) (No Text) <Froda> [10/2/2002 @ 9:16] (0/0)

I deeply regret .... <Reverend> [10/1/2002 @ 13:16] (1/6)

objection! <Froda> [10/1/2002 @ 13:44] (1/5)

It's part of my countercase as well. <NZ Strider> [10/1/2002 @ 16:06] (1/4)

"You have not weighed the Sinfulness of Sin" <Reverend> [10/1/2002 @ 19:04] (1/3)

This is difficult to respond to... <NZ Strider> [10/2/2002 @ 2:00] (1/2)

I'm sure we'll return to this vexed point <Froda> [10/2/2002 @ 9:01] (1/1)

I take exception... <Watson> [10/2/2002 @ 9:43] (0/0)

Here's what Tolkien himself said: <NZ Strider> [10/1/2002 @ 6:46] (7/23)

assent & query <Froda> [10/1/2002 @ 10:57] (2/7)

Supplemental to what Curious says, <NZ Strider> [10/1/2002 @ 15:45] (0/0)
I believe, <Curious> [10/1/2002 @ 12:24] (1/5)

Mechanically plausable.... <Reverend> [10/1/2002 @ 15:12] (1/4)

now that's interesting! <Froda> [10/1/2002 @ 15:35] (1/3)

But <Curious> [10/1/2002 @ 16:08] (1/2)

Yes, yes... <Reverend> [10/1/2002 @ 19:11] (1/1)

As <Curious> [10/1/2002 @ 20:04] (0/0)

This is the danger... <Watson> [10/1/2002 @ 9:21] (2/9)

Can I answer to both your responses here? <NZ Strider> [10/1/2002 @ 15:38] (1/5)

I object to <Curious> [10/1/2002 @ 16:43] (1/4)

Very quickly, <NZ Strider> [10/1/2002 @ 17:07] (1/3)

As you have said... <Watson> [10/1/2002 @ 20:23] (1/2)

I'm sorry if I <NZ Strider> [10/2/2002 @ 3:05] (1/1)

It isn't... <Watson> [10/2/2002 @ 8:50] (0/0)

Tolkien loved ambiguity! <Curious> [10/1/2002 @ 9:50] (1/2)

Niggle's Parish <Amatire> [10/1/2002 @ 10:34] (1/1)

Thanks! I <Curious> [10/1/2002 @ 12:03] (0/0)

And yet <Curious> [10/1/2002 @ 8:46] (0/0)
sheesh <Amatire> [10/1/2002 @ 8:41] (0/0)
Excellent, NZS. <Ataahua> [10/1/2002 @ 7:49] (0/0)
wow <Demosthenes> [10/1/2002 @ 7:17] (0/0)
Corrigenda <NZ Strider> [10/1/2002 @ 6:50] (0/0)

Does one have to actually put the ring on... <iowaboy> [9/30/2002 @ 20:48] (1/6)

I think there's a distinction to be made... <Silverlode> [9/30/2002 @ 21:53] (3/5)

Gollum does not promise to the Precious, but *by* the Precious (No Text) <NZ Strider> [10/1/2002 @ 6:26] (2/2)

Yes... <Silverlode> [10/1/2002 @ 21:03] (0/0)
swearing <Froda> [10/1/2002 @ 10:41] (0/0)

Nicely said, plus another important factor <Altaira> [9/30/2002 @ 23:48] (0/0)
I think so, for the most part... <iowaboy> [9/30/2002 @ 22:11] (0/0)

nice summary <Demosthenes> [9/30/2002 @ 20:47] (0/0)
Well... <Watson> [9/30/2002 @ 20:15] (4/15)

Hmm... I think I see several things differently from you. <NZ Strider> [10/1/2002 @ 7:17] (1/4)

What I attempted to say... <Watson> [10/1/2002 @ 9:13] (1/3)

i believe that we are in complete agreement... <Reverend> [10/1/2002 @ 15:03] (1/2)

Well... <Watson> [10/1/2002 @ 15:45] (1/1)

Very right.... <Reverend> [10/1/2002 @ 18:48] (0/0)

Another possibility. <Curious> [9/30/2002 @ 21:22] (1/2)

promises promises <Demosthenes> [9/30/2002 @ 21:41] (1/1)

But Frodo doesn't <Curious> [9/30/2002 @ 21:55] (0/0)

Then the difference <Merryk> [9/30/2002 @ 21:00] (2/5)

I wasn't aware that was the question being asked, but... <Watson> [9/30/2002 @ 21:26] (1/2)

Sorry for the tone... <Merryk> [9/30/2002 @ 22:28] (1/1)

Frodo's inheritance... <Watson> [9/30/2002 @ 23:35] (0/0)

Sam holds the Ring... <beren_boy> [9/30/2002 @ 21:09] (1/1)

Sam's desire for the ring <Demosthenes> [9/30/2002 @ 21:15] (0/0)

I agree. (No Text) <beren_boy> [9/30/2002 @ 20:35] (0/0)

Well, i think he used what he could do with the Ring as a threat. <Ufthak> [9/30/2002 @ 20:07] (0/0)

TheOneRing.net Rumour Mill's RPGBoard script (V2.22) was created by Brendan Byrd/SineSwiper of Resonator Software. It is copylefted under the conditions of the GNU Public License (GPL). It can be freely distributed and modified as long as it retains its GPL status.

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright � 2000 TheOneRing�.net. TheOneRing� is a registered service mark with exclusive right to grant use assigned to The One Ring, Inc. Unique Design by DesignHeroes.com